40 tahun tanpa bekalan air bersih, di mana keadilan?

Kuda Ranggi

Saya agak tergamam mendapat tahu menerusi siaran berita TV3 pukul 1.30 petang hari ini, 18 Mac, yang melaporkan keperitan penduduk di Kampung Tambalung, Kota Belud, Sabah, yang masih bergantung kepada sungai dan air hujan untuk bekalan air, iaitu untuk minum, memasak makanan, membasuh pakaian dan mandi.

Apa dah jadi dengan janji-janji yang diulang-ulang setiap kali menagaih undi rakyat semasa menghadapi pilihan raya?

Penduduk Kampung Tambalung tidak mendapat bekalan air bersih, walaupun berulang kali dipohon, sejak 40 tahun lalu. Sedih, memang sedih memandangkan pada tahun ini Malaysia akan menyambut ulang tahun kemerdekaan yang ke-50, setengah abad. Ini bermakna penduduk Kampung Tambalung tersisih daripada arus pembangunan hakiki sejak Sabah merdeka melalui Malaysia pada tahun 1963.

Para pemimpin kerajaan persekutuan dan kerajaan negeri Sabah begitu bangga dengan pembangunan fizikal yang dicapai selama ini. Bangga dengan Menara Berkembar Petronas, bangga dengan Lebuh Raya Utara-Selatan, bangga dengan Lapangan Terbang di Sepang dan di Kota Kinabalu, bangga dengan Litar F1, bangga dengan pelabuhan-pelabuhan di Tanjong Pelepas, di Pelabuhan Klang, di Kota Kinabalu dan bangga dengan kilang-kilang elektronik dan sebagainya.

Dalam kebanggaan itu, rupa-rupanya masih ada penduduk yang belum dapat menikmati bekalan air bersih, atau menikmati bekalan elektrik dan sistem jalan yang sempurna.

Apalah erti 50 tahun kegemilangan kemerdekaan. Di mana letaknya keadilan dalam pengagihan nikmat pembangunan. Di mana?

Saya masih ingat semangat dan cita-cita kerajaan yang dilontarkan oleh mantan Perdana Menteri Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad pada tahun 1982 semasa memperkenalkan dasar kependudukan Malaysia ke arah 70 juta penduduk.

Dalam mengatur strategi yang perlu untuk mencapai tujuan itu, kerajaan telahpun menjangkakan penggunaan air sebanyak 15.6 bilion meter padu. Kekurangan dijangkakan akan berlaku pada tahun 2000, iaitu tujuh tahun lalu, bagi jumlah penduduk sebanyak 21 juta. Sekarang, jumlah penduduk mencapai 26 juta.

Persoalan yang ingin saya ajukan ialah apakah kerajaan tidak mempunyai perancangan yang betul setelah dapat menjangkakan kekurangan bekalan air akan berlaku? Bukankah bekalan air merupakan hak asasi manusia untuk hidup?

Apakah jadahnya kita terus membekal air kepada Singapura sedangkan rakyat kita sendiri tidak dapat bekalan air bersih?

Kita juga ingin tahu apa dah jadi dengan dasar makanan, air dan pertanian yang dijanjikan oleh kerajaan. Kerajaan menyebut bahawa tekanan harus diberi ke atas kecukupan dari segi taburan, perubahan corak penggunaan dan juga ke atas peningkatan cara-cara penghasilan. Jika dasar ini dilaksanakan dengan betul, adil dan telus, masakan ada rakyat yang tidak mendapat bekalan air sejak 40 tahun lalu?

Malaysia mempunyai bermacam-macam kementerian dan agensi yang bermatlamat membasmi kemiskinan dan menaikkan taraf hidup rakyat. Kerajaan berjanji untuk mengadakan kemudahan-kemudahan asas yang cukup terutama bekalan air dan elektrik, tetapi setelah 50 tahun merdeka, kenapa masih ada kampung yang tidak mendapat bekalan air, bekalan elektrik dan sistem jalan yang sempurna?

Dalam kes Kampung Tambalung, jelas sekali bahawa kerajaan persekutuan dan kerajaan negeri Sabah telah gagal memenuhi tanggungjawab dan amanah kepada penduduk di situ yang masih belum diberi bekalan air bersih.

Adakah ini selari dengan slogan "Malaysia - Cemerlang, Gemilang dan Terbilang" atau memenuhi konsep dan pendekatan Islam Hadhari?

Apolitical Blues: Register as a voter before March 31st, 2007

A Voice

Well my telephone was ringing
And they told me it was Chairman Mao
Well my telephone was ringing
And they told me it was Chairman Mao
I don't care who it is 'Cause
I just don't wanna talk to 'em now

I've got the apolitical blues, yeah
Apolitical blues
The meanest blues of all
I don't care if it's the unholy four, John Wayne, or Dorothy Lamour
I just don't wanna talk to 'em now

-- Little Feat, Sailing Shoes (1972)

Apolitical or its synonymous terms, non-political or un-political, means having no interest in or association with politics, or a matter having no political relevance or importance.

If our social sphere is wide enough, we should observe that significant percentage of Malaysians is apolitical. Come election, campaigning by candidates is to convince these apolitical citizens or undecided voters, which in some areas could make or break a candidate.

What made some Malaysian apolitical? It's no disease but personal priority. You're likely to find this phenomenon in every country in the world, even countries with liberal freedom of speech and expressions. It may have a different percentage and profile but they exist.

There is a gamut of reasons to explain for these apolitical Malaysians. It could be out of ignorance and/or inability to comprehend complex socio-political issues. At the other end of the scale, it is apathy. "Urgh! This is politics. Cannot do anything lah. No point talking." This is the typical reaction to any serious discussion of public interest.

Indifference maybe the seldom quoted reason, however apathy could be a reaction brought about by frustration or disenchantment with bureaucracy and inefficiencies of civil servants, local council, regulators and authorities. It could also be due to impatience with the tedious and strenuous political process, and insufficient understanding of issues.

Actor Bruce Willis made a cute quote to express his frustration, "I hate government. I'm apolitical. Write that down. I'm not a Republican." It's his not-so-subliminal expression of his Democrat affiliations humorously expressed as apolitical. At that moment, the Republican must be in power and he is driving the fence sitters the Democrat way.

Then, there is the common repulsion "politics is dirty". Well, it's the people that made it so, but enough to put off many.

Certainly to many, politics is a luxury many could ill afford to spend time on, especially with the present confusing state of the economy. Ironically, with so many middle class and professionals affected by the poor handling of the economy, the noise from this usually apathetic segment is getting heard. It just goes to show that no one is permanently apolitical. Conversely, no one is permanently political.

To a significant many, they opt for a pragmatic political participation of middle ground politics based on the possibility for problem solving and addressing issues. This is often translated to affiliate "within the system" of Barisan Nasional (BN) political parties and its history of consensual politics.

Some became political reactionaries by turning to opposition politics to vent their critical energy. They see turning the distant possibility of changing the ruling party to be not so distant as the only solution. And, there are those throwbacks to feudalism days, whose involvement in politics come out of idolisation of personalities.

Politics is obviously perceived differently to different people but it is generally accepted to relate with government and power. A common simpleton view of politics is about achieving positions in public offices or political parties. There is also the cheeky perception of politics "as art of the possible".

Politics is the process and interplay of human social groups in making of decisions. Be it within government, corporate, academic, religion, and even the smallest social unit of family, politics is the "social relations involving authority or power". It has its science and art - theory, practice, description and analysis of system and behaviour. The whole shenanigan to justify the existence of political scientist, analyst, and political science professors.

One major determinant in politics is perceptions. Perception could be created via communication, media, and ear whispering and is said to be everything in politics. Political career could be created or destroyed by perceptions. Since the medium for publicity and airtime is limited commodity, there is tendency for quite a number of politicans to economise their political product and optimise the place and promotional elements in marketing themselves.

This is the area lacking in our politics. Politics of conspiracy is perpetuated rather than politics of governing. Instead of being more cerebral, our politics tend to be emotional, unjustified, and devoid of proper objective. The political behavior in the acquisition and application of power need to be more rationale. It must be based on rational political philosophy, ethical public behavior, and deliverables.

Sometimes, seemingly justified heli-view is misplaced hypocrasy. For instance, talking about racial integration but supporting vernacular schools. Promoting an Islamic branding but devoid of true values and content. There are those argument based on the Letters of Law and yet is in conflict with the Social Agreement of our forefathers as embedded in the Constitution.

If Malaysia is moving towards a k-Economy, so it seems said our Prime Minister with a Father of k-Economy title, then it is high time we move towards k-Politics. That's politics based on fact, information and rational arguments, rather than perception, hearsay, and cloak and dagger story of coffeehouses, warung and tai pai dong. The Prime Minister could even launch this k-Politics with all the pomp and pageantry he desperately desire for te next General Election hype. But do start by answering those unanswered questions.

Whether a person is considered political or apolitical, they generally have natural concerns. Everyday, we hear the berating, concerns, suggestions and argument for and against our government, and public officials. Are these voices legitimate voices? As citizen, it's their right to express their piece for or against. The subsequent question is: Are they responsible voices?

Responsible citizenship is not just about expressing their opinion. The bigger responsibility is to cast their vote to select the representatives for Parliament or State Assembly. This is an important aspect of citizenship. These representatives are the avenues to express our voices at the highest institution of Government.

The basis you vote could be for any reasons. You could be voting for the ability as lawmaker or at the other end as community problem solver. Whether you voted based on the candidate's likeable personality or his party affiliation or just on his ability, the vote is yours to cast. I do hope the basis is rational and come with practical expectations.

Many people are perceptive and eloquent in indentifying, analysing, and arguing of issues. If they do not vote, are they worth any salt? Think about it. If they can't even exercise the very simple and basic right as citizen, does it indicate the seriousness of their concerns?

So, if you are a registered voter, come out and vote.

If you qualify but yet to register as voters, do so. Read the Election Commission Malaysia (ECM)'s website http://www.spr.gov.my for instruction. In a news report on March 16th, 2007 mStar (The full news report here), Secretary of the ECM, Datuk Kamaruzaman Mohd Noorin is reported as follows:
Beliau menasihatkan mereka yang ingin mengambil bahagian dalam pilihan raya akan datang agar mendaftar segera, sebaik-baiknya sebelum tempoh semakan terakhir tamat hujung bulan ini.

Please register before the voters' roll is closed this March 31st, 2007.

But if you registered as voter or qualify but did not register to vote, forever hold your peace.

I don't care if it's the unholy four, John Wayne, or Dorothy Lamour.
I just don't wanna talk to 'em now.